California experiments with fracking regulation

Leslie Layton for New America Media / ChicoSol


The Sierra Club’s Dave Garcia is part of a campaign against hydraulic fracturing in Northern California. (Karen Laslo/ChicoSol)

CHICO, Calif. — On a summer morning, Dave Garcia, the political chair of the Sierra Club’s Northern California Yahi chapter, occasionally interrupted a tour of gas wells in the Sutter Buttes to point out wildlife: a scampering cottontail rabbit, a vigilant red-tailed hawk, and whizzing western kingbirds.

Garcia had brought a pair of journalists here to witness fracking in the Northern Sacramento Valley, something that most Northern Californians probably have no idea is underway in this area. The well sites appear almost deserted—there are no gas flares, no trucks moving huge tanks of water, no towering pump jacks. In fact, people are rarely seen at these electronically monitored stations. 

Hydraulic fracturing, or “fracking”— a procedure used to capture hard-to-reach pools of oil and gas — has fueled a debate nationwide. Some studies show that fracking has links to water and air pollution, increased seismic activity, and water shortages.

In California, most of the debate has focused on development of the Monterey Shale in the southern San Joaquin Valley. There, oil companies want to exploit the nation’s largest shale-oil reserve. They’ve already begun, using fracking, horizontal drilling and a technique called “acidizing.” Much less attention has been focused on the natural gas reserves in rural Northern California, where fracking has occurred in Sutter, Glenn and Colusa counties.

According to an industry website, of the dozens of Sutter County gas wells, 15 were fracked a couple of years ago by Venoco, a Denver-based oil and gas company. These are small-scale fracking operations, comparatively speaking, but the Sierra Club’s Garcia is nonetheless concerned about possible contamination of the Tuscan Aquifer that slopes from the Sierras to the west side of the Buttes.

Efforts to regulate the drilling technique in California have also ramped up.

Earlier this fall, Gov. Jerry Brown signed Senate Bill 4, which regulates fracking in the state for the first time. Brown supports increased fracking in the state.

SB 4 directs the state Dept. of Conservation’s Division of Oil, Gas, and Geothermal Resources (DOGGR) to establish regulations for fracking and another oil extraction method called acidizing, where acids are injected into a well to unlock oil deposits. Oil and gas companies will be required to obtain a permit, disclose chemical additives, and notify neighbors of plans to frack. The law also requires an independent scientific study.

Senator Fran Pavley, D-Agoura Hills, an SB 4 sponsor, said the law establishes some of the nation’s most stringent regulations for fracking and acidizing. But some environmentalists have criticized it for not going far enough. A number of environmental groups, including the Sierra Club and California League of Conservation Voters, have either didn’t back or withdrew support for the bill. 

Anti-fracking activists across the state continue to press for a moratorium on fracking. In Butte County, a group belonging to the Chico Citizen Action Network is pressing for a local ordinance to halt fracking.

As California is on the brink of a great experiment in fracking regulation, state residents are grappling with a key question—whether fracking can be successfully regulated and safely conducted. Throughout the state, key interest groups — from anti-fracking activists and environmentalists to pro-business and oil industry representatives — are lining up to wage a battle over community support for fracking.

Fracking in rural Northern California

In the Northern Sacramento Valley, gas-well fracking has been underway, quietly and without oversight, for years, underscoring the freedom the industry has had to operate at will. California was late in regulating fracking.  On her website, Sen. Pavley points out that 14 other oil-producing states already regulate the practice.

In the fracking world, the word itself can mean different things.

Fracking involves drilling thousands of feet into the earth, then blasting a mixture of sand, water, and chemicals into an encased well at high pressure to fracture rock, allowing the oil and gas in it to escape. It requires large volumes of water—a single operation might need 5 million gallons if the well is drilled horizontally.

By drilling horizontally, a well can be extended for thousands of feet. In several of these huge projects, chemicals have leaked or gas has seeped into aquifers in incidents that were linked to faulty well construction.

In California, “acid fracking,” or well acidizing, may yield better results than horizontal drilling, according to news reports. These “acid jobs” involve injecting huge volumes of highly corrosive hydrofluoric acid and other acids into a well to dissolve the rock.

In the Northern Sacramento Valley, fracking means fracturing rock in vertical or slanted gas wells, said Chico State geology professor Todd Greene. Fracking here “is not anywhere close to the type of fracking you see in Pennsylvania, Wyoming and New York,” he said.

Horizontal drilling has been used to exploit the Marcellus Shale and other large deposits in other parts of California.

Greene, who previously worked for the oil industry, notes that this part of the valley sits on sandstone—not shale rock. This area has gas, but little to no oil. Horizontal drilling that makes large-scale projects feasible isn’t usually effective in sandstone formations, Greene said.

But fracking in the North Valley raises similar concerns about possible leakage of toxic chemicals that are used in the process. More importantly, the lack of information about the extent of fracking in this region and elsewhere in the state point to inadequate state monitoring of a widespread practice.

Greene said, for example, that it would be useful to know what’s being done with the contaminated wastewater that flows back up a well after injection. On well pads in the Sutter Buttes, green drums hold up to 3,500 gallons.

Many of the wells are accessible from Pass Road, which winds along the base of what is known as the world’s smallest mountain range. The gas wells are behind gates that bear no-trespassing and danger signs. If you approach the wells, you might catch the wafting smell of gas or chemicals, or hear a humming or pumping sound. Homes on domestic wells are occasionally sprinkled around the bluffs.

Despite the widespread drilling – sometimes close to homes — it’s not easy to get basic questions answered, such as the direction of the drilling or where the wastewater goes. State regulators balked at the word “interview,” and an oil conglomerate provided what amounted to a “we don’t talk to the media” statement. 

A trail of fracked wells

DOGGR regulates California well-drilling, but hasn’t yet begun requiring an additional permit for fracking. DOGGR’s administration has been widely criticized in the past for failing to even monitor fracking. Officials declined to be interviewed for this story.

With little information provided by the state regulatory agency, the public has had to turn to other, incomplete sources of information on fracking operations in the state. 

In response to critics, DOGGR began compiling records on well-fracking last year, said Kyle Ferrar, state coordinator for the nonprofit FracTracker Alliance.

FracTracker has identified 237 fracked wells that haven’t been reported to DOGGR. One of those missing from the DOGGR database is a Sutter Buttes well.

Sometime after Venoco fracked wells in the Sutter Buttes in 2011, it sold its Northern California holdings. DOGGR’s website indicates the wells are now under management of Vintage Production California, a subsidiary of Occidental Petroleum.

Occidental Petroleum’s External Relations Manager Amy Fonzo responded via an email, saying that due to “competitive and proprietary reasons,” Vintage doesn’t discuss its operations. 

Property owners who lease land don’t always fare well with the oil companies, either. 

A Glenn County landowner contacted the Butte Environmental Council (BEC), an environmental advocacy organization, earlier this year after an exchange with a company that drills for gas on her property. She was hesitant to renew a lease that required signing over mineral rights because she had grown increasingly worried about the safety of fracking. 

The company told her it wasn’t fracking, but if she didn’t renew the contract, it could access gas on her land from a neighboring parcel, according to BEC. 

Garcia first learned about horizontal fracking from the HBO film Gasland, which documented cases of groundwater contamination in Pennsylvania, Colorado and Wyoming. He then turned for information on this area to the website FracFocus, where oil and gas companies have been asked to report fracking.

FracFocus provides a rough and incomplete sketch of fracking in the state. Perhaps most alarming to many community activists is the fact that drilling companies don’t provide complete listings of the chemical concoctions they’re using, noting in some cases that an additive is a “trade secret.”

“Oil companies are way ahead of us in terms of what’s going on,” Garcia said. “They’re marching right along in their shroud of secrecy.”

Despite concerns about fracking’s risks to health and the environment, some community members welcome a fracking boom in the hopes that it will bring jobs. 

Where are the jobs?

On a July evening in a Marysville meeting hall, Bishop Ron Allen stood at the podium, discussing in his booming preacher’s voice unemployment, oil and untapped riches.

Allen, the founder of Sacramento’s International Faith Based Coalition, lent his oratory skill to promote a fracking boom at an “educational summit.” Allen told an audience that included Tea Party supporters and landowners that expanded oil and gas production would provide jobs and generate income in the “underserved community.”

“California has been standing on the sidelines despite having 60 percent of America’s shale [oil] reserves right beneath our feet,” Allen said. Then he added: “Somebody help us, please.”

The summit was sponsored by Roseville’s nonprofit Coalition of Energy Users, whose key leadership has ties to conservative organizations. It was one of several events this past summer, held by various groups, in which fracking was presented as a path out of poverty and economic stagnation. 

Outside the summit meeting, anti-fracking protesters held signs denouncing “Big Oil” and passed out flyers. Some of the protesters had requested seats at the summit weeks in advance, but said that when they arrived, they found their names on a “Do not admit” list and were greeted by members of the Sons of Liberty motorcycle club, who served as bouncers at the event.

Job creation is often trumpeted as a benefit of expanded production, but it’s hard to know whether fracking creates work on the valley’s northern gas fields.

Sutter County is a top producer of dry gas — the gas that comes from fields without any oil in the mix. The county has one of the highest unemployment rates in the state at 13.6 percent in July, compared to the statewide average at 8.7 percent.

But some environmentalists argue that the hidden costs of fracking aren’t being considered.

“We’re going after the dirtiest fossil fuels that are left,” said Kassie Siegel, the director of the Climate Law Institute at the Center for Biological Diversity. “We are going to have higher and higher health and environmental costs. People will get sick and the climate crisis will get worse.”

Regulating fracking

Activists have been fighting for a moratorium that would stall fracking pending the outcome of scientific study. 

The oil industry fought off several bills that would have imposed a statewide moratorium on fracking in the 2013 legislative session. It also opposed Pavley’s compromise SB 4.

On its website, the Western States Petroleum Association, an industry lobbying group, says a law based on SB 4 should at least end talk of fracking moratoriums.

“There is no longer a place in California for the emotion-fueled demands for a moratorium of hydraulic fracturing,” wrote Catherine Reheis-Boyd, president of the WSPA. 

Environmental organizations say they’re worried that DOGGR will rubber-stamp permit applications instead of requiring environmental review. They’re worried that the bill prevents imposition of a statewide moratorium at some future point, though Pavley has disputed this.

Organizations that support a ban or moratorium warn against reliance on regulation. They often note industry exemptions from the nation’s Safe Drinking Water Act through what’s popularly known as the “Halliburton Loophole.”

Eight California communities have passed resolutions to ban fracking, including Berkeley, Culver City and Marin County, according to Food and Water Watch.

A few days after passage of Pavley’s bill, several anti-fracking activists set up a table at the Saturday Chico farmers’ market, collecting signatures on a ban petition. Activist Willow Dejesus said she’s worried about fracking’s impact on water supplies and aquifer contamination.

“Water doesn’t get any closer to the heart of our livelihood,” said Dejesus. “I don’t think regulation is an answer. There’s tons of regulations in place, but there’s always exemptions, always people who don’t follow regulations, always accidents.”

Though FracFocus doesn’t show fracked wells in Butte County, Garcia says he’s identified 10 active gas wells in the county. Once natural-gas prices start climbing back up, the wells could be subject to fracking, he said.

“These companies are going to be going to the old gas wells they have in Butte County and reworking them,” Garcia said. “That’s why it’s critical to get a moratorium.”

California’s fracking story has really just begun.

This story was produced as part of a 2013 NAM Fellowship on Energy and the Environment for Northern California Ethnic Media (a collaboration with SoundVision Productions’ Burn: An Energy Journal) with the support by S.D. Bechtel, Jr. Foundation and PG&E.

more »

Fracking in England: wicked spirits or energy bounty?

Robert Rand, BURN Editor

One of the pleasures of traveling the world is spending time with foreign taxi cab drivers. What visitor to London, Moscow, Bangkok or Buenos Aires hasn’t hopped into a cab, engaged a driver in conversation, and come away with some real insight into local events?

That happened to me recently in Eastbourne, an old British resort town situated next to Beachy Head – a towering  cliff with chalk white shoulders that hovers above the English Channel. Eastbourne is on Britain’s southeast coast, near the place William the Conquerer fought in 1066. It’s also not far from a village called Balcombe, where a more contemporary battle is underway about fracking, the controversial technology (also known as hydraulic fracturing) that inserts vast quantities of water and chemicals into the ground to extract natural gas and oil from shale formations.

I’ll get back to the cabbie in a moment, but first the fracking backstory. Proponents say it’s a safe and effective way to collect shale gas and oil. Its many opponents say the technology’s mix of water and chemicals is toxic and harms the environment.

In the US, fracking has boosted shale gas and oil extraction to such an extent that energy self-sufficiency seems within reach. It has also unleashed serious debate in America and abroad about fracking’s capacity to taint groundwater and, through the methane that’s released in the process, warm the planet.

In the UK, hydraulic fracturing was suspended two years ago after the fracking of Britain’s first shale gas well was blamed for triggering several small earthquakes in northern England. The ban was lifted last December, shortly before the British Geological Survey (BGS) reported that shale gas reserves in the north alone are much greater than previously thought.

Danny Alexander, chief secretary to the British Treasury, said the BGS analysis “confirms the huge potential that shale gas has for the UK.”  The Telegraph newspaper concluded that shale gas in northern England could meet the country’s gas needs for the next 40 years.

With respect to the rest of the country, the BGS study said, “other areas in the UK have shale gas and shale oil potential,” including southern coastal regions. With a strong shale wind at its back, the British government has issued 176 licenses this year for onshore oil and gas exploration, including exploratory drilling near Balcombe.

The anti-fracking demonstrations in Balcombe began in July and targeted the energy company Cuadrilla, which plans to frack shale formations there. The controversy is a classic developer vs. environmentalist tussle. Fracking opponents have boisterously made their case, and they’ve made the front pages of England’s newspapers as well.  “The grassroots protests in the village of Balcombe against fracking have sparked a countrywide rebellion as villages up and down the country vow they will also blockade any attempts to drill,” the Telegraph reported. The BBC has also given the story wide coverage.

Cuadrilla began test drilling for oil in Balcombe on August 2, although fracking was not yet carried out.

All of this was on my taxi driver’s mind when I entered his vehicle a week ago. Our conversation went on for quite some time (it continued even after I reached my destination), but it boiled down to something like this:

“You’re from America, aren’t you?”

“Yes,” I said.

“Lots of fracking there.”


“The Arab kingdoms are frightfully worried, you know, because you Americans won’t be purchasing their oil much longer, thanks to all that shale drilling.”

“Yes. The U.S. might even become an exporter of oil. But what’s the story with fracking here in England?”

“Some of us don’t like it.”


“Let me put it this way. How big is Texas?”

“Pretty big.”

“Did you know you can fit about five Englands into Texas?”

“No, I didn’t. But what’s your point?”

“Your country is big, and fracking easily can take place in places where nobody lives. Our country is small, and fracking is more likely to occur right outside my window.”

End of conversation. According to my cabbie, the case for NIMBY (Not in My Backyard) is especially compelling in the UK, where the fear of negative-fracking-consequence is palpable and very close to home. As he put it, “We will feel it more than you.”

The problem is, at least for fracking opponents in England, a lot of British government officials would like to feel the kind of shale gas and oil boom currently underway in the US. They argue that shale drilling will lead to lower energy prices in the UK. Boris Johnson, the London mayor and a fracking supporter, has even offered to open up the streets of Shakespeare’s city to hydraulic fracturing if the bounty be good.

Which one day soon will probably cause my cabbie and the people of Balcombe to utter what Buckingham said to his sovereign in Shakespeare’s Henry VI:

         Such as my heart doth tremble to unfold.

         A sort of naughty persons, lewdly bent…

        Have practised dangerously against your state,

        Dealing with witches and with conjurers…

        Raising up wicked spirits from under ground.


more »

Rome BURNS: Was that a fracking quake?

Robert Rand, BURN Editor

I was sitting in my dentist’s office here in Rome a few weeks ago, watching an overhead television set while Dr. Pasquale drilled into a molar. The screen showed some sort of public gathering, with various orators and a guy playing the guitar. Behind them was a sign that said, “Per non dimenticare.” Do not forget.

I had forgotten. At the end of May, 2012, two earthquakes hit Emilia Romagna, a region in northern Italy that includes Bologna. The first quake measured 6.0. The second had a magnitude of 5.8. Twenty four people died, several hundred were injured, and 15,000 people were forced from their homes.

Emilia quakeThe event on my dentist’s television screen commemorated the first anniversary of the Emilia earthquake. Newspaper coverage of the anniversary included something that caught my eye: there was speculation that fracking may have caused the quake.

Fracking, or hydraulic fracturing, is the technology that injects a highly pressurized cocktail of fluids and substances into the ground to extract natural gas from shale formations. It is a controversial issue in the U.S. and elsewhere (here in Europe, fracking has been banned in France and in Bulgaria).  Proponents say fracking is a safe and effective way to collect shale gas, which America has in abundance.

Opponents – and there are many – say fracking’s mix of water and chemicals is toxic and harms the environment. Fracking was an issue in the 2012 presidential campaign, the subject of a recent movie starring Matt Damon, and the focus of one of Alex’s stories here on BURN.

Fracking has also been implicated as a trigger for earthquakes, and that gets us back to what happened in Emilia Romagna one year ago. In the weeks following the Emilia tremors, the Italian press reported that local residents had blamed fracking for what happened. Emilia Romagna has natural gas reserves which had been conventionally tapped in years past, but not with fracking. People were suspicious nonetheless.

“The most popular term in Italy today is ‘fracking’ and in recent days there has been a lot of speculation about fracking and the earthquake in Emilia Romagna.” That was the immediate post-earthquake pronouncement of Beppe Grillo, a popular anti-establishment-comedian-turned-politician who scored big in recent parliamentary elections. When Grillo speaks, people listen. Last month, on the anniversary date, Grillo reiterated his concerns regarding fracking. “The Emilia earthquake? I think the holes they drill while searching for gas are partially to blame.”

The Italian Ministry of Development says fracking has never been used in Emilia.

And it’s not even clear whether fracking is used much at all in Italy. Maria Rita D’Orsogna, a California State University-Northridge physicist and activist who opposes fracking, told me she has found only two documented incidents of fracking in Italy, and neither was in Emilia Romagna. “I do not know if anybody has any real proof,” she said regarding Grillo’s assertions.

D’Orsogna says there is the lack of transparency in Italy about natural gas development and fracking, and that’s what especially bothers her. In a contribution to Grillo’s blog, she wrote: “Given that people are talking about it all over the world and given that people want answers, do the people currently governing us…want to say something about how Italy is positioned in relation to the possibility of carrying out fracking in our land?”

At the request of the president of the Emila Romagna region, an international commission has been set up to investigate any possible links between fracking and the 2012 earthquakes.


more »

Download BURN Radio Specials

Rising Seas

The Switch: America’s Electrical Grid

  • DOWNLOAD The full hour (54:00)
  • DOWNLOAD How the grid works: an explainer (4:25)
  • DOWNLOAD Paul Stockton: Keeping the grid safe (2:52)
  • DOWNLOAD Army’s micro-grid for combat zones (6:34)
  • DOWNLOAD Life, off the grid (7:38)
  • DOWNLOAD Duke Energy leader Jim Rogers on smart grids & brownouts (8:00)
  • DOWNLOAD The Hoboken power emergency – Part 1 (3:57)
  • DOWNLOAD The Hoboken power emergency – Part 2 (3:21)
  • DOWNLOAD A day with Tim Gallant, power grid linesman (5:37)
  • DOWNLOAD Electrifying rural America (5:54)

Particles: Nuclear Power After Fukushima

The Hunt for Oil: Risks and Rewards

Energy & The 2012 Election – A 2-Hour Special

Hour 1: The Power of One Election and America’s Energy Future

  • DOWNLOAD FULL (54:00): The Power of One Election and America’s Energy Future
  • DOWNLOAD SEGMENT A (17:40): Fracking
  • DOWNLOAD SEGMENT B (8:48): Energy and The President
  • DOWNLOAD SEGMENT C1 (12:23): Michigan’s Historic Choice
  • DOWNLOAD SEGMENT C2 (5:33): Why Energy Legislation is So Hard

Hour Two: The Power and Politics of New Energy Frontiers

  • DOWNLOAD FULL (54:00): The Power and Politics of New Energy Frontiers
  • DOWNLOAD SEGMENT A1 (17:19): Alaska Arctic drilling
  • DOWNLOAD SEGMENT A2 (5:30): Obama and Romney Energy Platforms
  • DOWNLOAD SEGMENT B1 (10:30): The Elusive Mighty Battery
  • DOWNLOAD SEGMENT B2 (7:57): The Need for Speed
  • DOWNLOAD SEGMENT B3 (3:50): Guiding The Energy Future

. . . . . blank line . . . . .
. . . . . blank line . . . . .
You can also listen to BURN podcasts on Stitcher.
. . . . . blank line . . . . .

more »